Home > Economics > It’s Really Demand

It’s Really Demand

Richard Williamson, Steve Waldman and others have produced some interesting posts about the UK economy.   The CPI numbers tell a confusing story about AD, and people would like to explain this.

Chris Dillow’s response to my call for an NGDP target raised the (persistent) suggestion that the UK supply-side is not able to keep up with demand growth.  This puts Chris in the same position as that held by inflation hawks like Andrew Sentance, I suppose – an odd alliance.

Jason Rave’s analysis is probably my favourite, as he nails inflation targeting as the source of all this woe, advising that we should ignore the “inflationary illusions“.  Here, here!

I don’t really have much to add to all this discussion, but I’d like to attempt a quick defence of the much-maligned UK supply-side.

If we take the liberty of ignoring the effect of the VAT changes as Whitehall takes a larger cut of nominal spending, a supply-side constraint on demand growth just does not look that obvious.  This graph shows the annual rate of change of both nominal GDP at basic prices, and real GDP (note this is the change over four quarters, not the more volatile quarter-on-quarter rate of change):

UK Nominal GDP at Basic Prices vs Real GDP

UK Nominal GDP at Basic Prices vs Real GDP. ONS series ABML, YBEZ

In 2011 as a whole, NGDP at Basic Prices – the income actually available to produce new stuff – increased just 2%.  And there was a 0.7% increase in output.   Is that really such a terrible supply-side performance?

So I think the VAT change is perfectly sufficient to explain the size of the “wedge” between 2011 NGDP (a pathetic 3% even including VAT) and output growth, and the UK supply-side performance gives little evidence for pessimism about whether faster demand growth would only be inflationary.

Advertisements
Categories: Economics
  1. May 1, 2012 at 06:29

    Hi Britmouse

    This is very interesting, where did you get the NGDP at basic prices data? I would love to plot that against US NGDP. It’s clear to me now that if there is a puzzle at all between the two countries, the answer would appear to lie in 2009. NGDP growth is clearly sufficient to explain the anaemic performance of the recovery more recently.

    Thanks
    Richard

  2. May 1, 2012 at 10:41

    Hi Richard. The data is in here:

    http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?table-id=A2&dataset=qna

    The series code for NGDP at Basic Prices is ABML.

    The distortions between NGDP at Basic Prices and at Market Prices start in 2008 Q4 with the VAT cut in December that quarter.

  3. May 1, 2012 at 17:20

    It’s become clear to me the VAT has screwed things up far, far more than I thought. UK NGDP is about 5-6% further below trend compared to the US. I’m revising my belief that there is much going on in the supply department.

  4. May 22, 2012 at 20:07

    Britmouse, this is very interesting…this has not gotten enough attention!

  1. May 1, 2012 at 19:02
  2. May 1, 2012 at 21:48
  3. May 2, 2012 at 16:31
  4. May 17, 2012 at 10:31
  5. June 27, 2012 at 09:50

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: