Home > Monetary Policy > 1930s Watch: Does Monetary Policy Matter?

1930s Watch: Does Monetary Policy Matter?

Friedman and Schwartz via Romer and Romer in “The Most Dangerous Idea in Federal Reserve History: Monetary Policy Doesn’t Matter”, quote a Fed official from the 1930s:

“The consequences of … an economic debauch are inevitable. We are now suffering them. Can they be corrected or removed by cheap money? We do not believe that they can. … there is no short cut or panacea for the rectification of existing conditions.”

It’s a good thing we learned from the 1930s!  Oh, wait.  Here is what economists are saying today:

Discussion of monetary policy is tending to focus on what might aid recovery – but it is unclear that monetary policy alone (as traditionally understood) can do very much to resolve our present problems. … There is no easy way out.

However there is no monetary magic bullet – against a back drop of fiscal austerity and a damaged financial system it is highly questionable that monetary policy alone can secure a recovery

The ability of monetary policy to boost demand in the current environment seems highly limited.

However, we should not delude [our]self that changing the [monetary policy] remit alone will be a panacea for the UK’s macroeconomic problems.

Happy new year. Normal blogging service will be resumed shortly.

About these ads
Categories: Monetary Policy
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 567 other followers

%d bloggers like this: